Effect of MDF-Cover for Water Reservoir Evaporation Reduction, Experimental, and Soft Computing Approaches

Document Type: Regular Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Faculty, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

3 Professor, Civil Engineering Faculty, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

10.22115/scce.2020.213617.1156

Abstract

In the civil engineering designs and water resources management projects, various methods have been proposed to prevent the evaporation of water storage tanks and pools, including the use of physical materials. The use of MDF sheets is an evaporation reduction method using physical elements, which can be useful in controlling evaporation. The present study investigates water evaporation reduction from a standard Colorado Sunken evaporation pan using 50 mm-thick MDF sheets covering 100% of the evaporation pan. The least-square support vector machine (LSSVM) and an artificial neural network (ANN) were used to estimate evaporation reduction. The efficiency of the intelligent methods was evaluated by the root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), and mean absolute error (MAE). The R2, RMSE, and MAE values were attained for the LSSVM method in the test stage 0.8755, 1.6517, and 2.2042, and for the ANN model 0.7714, 2.112 and 1.6732 respectively which shows the LSSVM model has better performance than ANN model. The evaporation correlation, according to the Pearson test for sheet cover, MDF with minimum temperature, maximum temperature, sunny hours, is positive. It has 0.442, 0.362, and 0.387 values, respectively, and with minimum damp, maximum damp, pressure is negative and has -0.313, -0.350, and -0.319 values, respectively. The results reveal that MDF had satisfactory performance in controlling evaporation and lead to higher water resource storage. Performing tests for three months indicate that MDF sheets can result in an approximately 91% reduction in evaporation on average.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]     Selek B, Aksu H. Water Resources Potential of Turkey, 2020, p. 241–56. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11729-0_8.

[2]     Ehteram M, Karami H, Farzin S. Reservoir Optimization for Energy Production Using a New Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models. Water Resour Manag 2018;32:2539–60. doi:10.1007/s11269-018-1945-1.

[3]     Helfer F, Lemckert C, Zhang H. Impacts of climate change on temperature and evaporation from a large reservoir in Australia. J Hydrol 2012;475:365–78. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.008.

[4]     Sima S, Ahmadalipour A, Tajrishy M. Mapping surface temperature in a hyper-saline lake and investigating the effect of temperature distribution on the lake evaporation. Remote Sens Environ 2013;136:374–85. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.05.014.

[5]     Khan MA, Issac VC. Evaporation reduction in stock tanks for increasing water supplies. J Hydrol 1990;119:21–9. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(90)90031-R.

[6]     Alvarez VM, Baille A, Martínez JMM, González-Real MM. Efficiency of shading materials in reducing evaporation from free water surfaces. Agric Water Manag 2006;84:229–39. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2006.02.006.

[7]     Alam S, AlShaikh AA. Use of palm fronds as shaded cover for evaporation reduction to improve water storage efficiency. J King Saud Univ - Eng Sci 2013;25:55–8. doi:10.1016/j.jksues.2012.01.003.

[8]     Santafé MR, Ferrer Gisbert PS, Sánchez Romero FJ, Torregrosa Soler JB, Ferrán Gozálvez JJ, Ferrer Gisbert CM. Implementation of a photovoltaic floating cover for irrigation reservoirs. J Clean Prod 2014;66:568–70. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.006.

[9]     aghvami m. Field study of physical methods of reducing evaporation from small water. Semnan University, 2019.

[10]    Guven A, Kişi Ö. Daily pan evaporation modeling using linear genetic programming technique. Irrig Sci 2011;29:135–45. doi:10.1007/s00271-010-0225-5.

[11]    Kisi O. Pan evaporation modeling using least square support vector machine, multivariate adaptive regression splines and M5 model tree. J Hydrol 2015;528:312–20. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.052.

[12]    Tezel G, Buyukyildiz M. Monthly evaporation forecasting using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Theor Appl Climatol 2016;124:69–80. doi:10.1007/s00704-015-1392-3.

[13]    Kisi O, Heddam S. Evaporation modelling by heuristic regression approaches using only temperature data. Hydrol Sci J 2019;64:653–72. doi:10.1080/02626667.2019.1599487.

[14]    Subramanya K. Abstractions from Precipitation. 2008.

[15]    Suykens JAK. Nonlinear modelling and support vector machines. IMTC 2001 Proc 18th IEEE Instrum Meas Technol Conf Rediscovering Meas Age Informatics (Cat No01CH 37188), vol. 1, IEEE; n.d., p. 287–94. doi:10.1109/IMTC.2001.928828.

[16]    Anandhi A, Srinivas V V., Nanjundiah RS, Nagesh Kumar D. Downscaling precipitation to river basin in India for IPCC SRES scenarios using support vector machine. Int J Climatol 2008;28:401–20. doi:10.1002/joc.1529.

[17]    Modaresi F, Araghinejad S, Ebrahimi K. A Comparative Assessment of Artificial Neural Network, Generalized Regression Neural Network, Least-Square Support Vector Regression, and K-Nearest Neighbor Regression for Monthly Streamflow Forecasting in Linear and Nonlinear Conditions. Water Resour Manag 2018;32:243–58. doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1807-2.

[18]    Mujumdar PP, Ghosh S. Modeling GCM and scenario uncertainty using a possibilistic approach: Application to the Mahanadi River, India. Water Resour Res 2008;44. doi:10.1029/2007WR006137.

[19]    Naderpour H, Rafiean AH, Fakharian P. Compressive strength prediction of environmentally friendly concrete using artificial neural networks. J Build Eng 2018;16:213–9. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.007.

[20]    Singh KK, Pal M, Singh VP. Estimation of Mean Annual Flood in Indian Catchments Using Backpropagation Neural Network and M5 Model Tree. Water Resour Manag 2010;24:2007–19. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9535-x.

[21]    Ahmadi A, Moridi A, Lafdani EK, Kianpisheh G. Assessment of climate change impacts on rainfall using large scale climate variables and downscaling models – A case study. J Earth Syst Sci 2014;123:1603–18. doi:10.1007/s12040-014-0497-x.

[22]    Ghazvinian H, Mousavi S-F, Karami H, Farzin S, Ehteram M, Hossain MS, et al. Integrated support vector regression and an improved particle swarm optimization-based model for solar radiation prediction. PLoS One 2019;14:e0217634. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217634.

[23]    Nourani V, Sayyah Fard M. Sensitivity analysis of the artificial neural network outputs in simulation of the evaporation process at different climatologic regimes. Adv Eng Softw 2012;47:127–46. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.12.014.

[24]    Traore S, Wang Y-M, Kerh T. Artificial neural network for modeling reference evapotranspiration complex process in Sudano-Sahelian zone. Agric Water Manag 2010;97:707–14. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.002.