Comparative Analysis of Rigid Pavement Using Westergaard Method and Computer Program

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

College of Engineering and Architecture, University of Nizwa, Initial Campus at Birkat-al-Mouz, 616, Nizwa, Oman

Abstract

Country’s economic, social and cultural development is mainly dependent on the performance of its highway structure. Selection of appropriate pavement type and related design method are vital for the improvement of pavement performance and its service life, and reduction in the initial and maintenance cost.  The rigid pavement exposed to many distresses during its service life resulted due to the variation of traffic loading, material properties, and climatic conditions. The main objective of this project is to make a comparison between manual and computer design for rigid pavement structure under different loading, material properties, and temperature regimes. For manual design and computer design, “Westergaard Method” and “KENPAVE software” were used respectively. The stress analysis results revealed that edge stresses are higher as compared with interior and corner location, and stresses estimated at all locations with Westergaard method are significantly lower than stresses estimated with KENPAVE software. Results of sensitivity analysis showed that change in pavement thickness, material properties, and wheel load has a significant impact on developed stresses at different slab locations.

Highlights

Google Scholar

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]     S.P. Chandola. Transportation Engineering. AN ISO 9001: 2000 company. 2000.
[2]     Chakroborty P, Das A. Principles of transportation engineering. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.; 2007.
[3]     Setyawan A, Zoorob SE, Hasan KE. Investigating and Comparing Traffic Induced and Restrained Temperature Stresses in a Conventional Rigid Pavement and Semi-Rigid Layers. Procedia Eng 2013;54:875–84. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.080.
[4]     Jackson N, Puccinelli J. effects of multiple freeze cycles and deep frost penetration on pavement performance and cost. FHWA-HRT-06-121 November; 2006.
[5]     Khan MI, Qadeer MA, Harwalkar AB. Mechanistic Analysis of Rigid Pavement for Temperature Stresses Using Ansys. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng 2014;11:90–107.
[6]     Zones IHW. HIGHWAY DESIGN MANUAL 2006.
[7]     Officials T. AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. AASHTO; 1993.
[8]     www.dot.state.fl.us n.d.
[9]     Medani TO, Ziedan AS, Hussein AG. Initial Cost Comparison of Rigid and Flexible Pavements Case Study: Khartoum State. Univ Khartoum Eng J 2016;4.
[10]    Bartosova L. Stresses from Loading on Rigid Pavement. 2003.
[11]    Belshe M, Mamlouk MS, Kaloush KE, Rodezno M. Temperature Gradient and Curling Stresses in Concrete Pavement with and without Open-Graded Friction Course. J Transp Eng 2011;137:723–9. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000254.