Developing Soft-Computing Models for Simulating the Maximum Moment of Circular Reinforced Concrete Columns

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 Ph.D., Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Al Albayt University, 25113 Mafraq, Jordan

2 Ph.D., Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering Technology Al-Balqa Applied University, 11134 Amman, Jordan

Abstract

There has been a significant rise in research using soft-computing techniques to predict critical structural engineering parameters. A variety of models have been designed and implemented to predict crucial elements such as the load-bearing capacity and the mode of failure in reinforced concrete columns. These advancements have made significant contributions to the field of structural engineering, aiding in more accurate and reliable design processes. Despite this progress, a noticeable gap remains in literature. There's a notable lack of comprehensive studies that evaluate and compare the capabilities of various machine learning models in predicting the maximum moment capacity of circular reinforced concrete columns. The present study addresses a gap in the literature by examining and comparing the capabilities of various machine learning models in predicting the ultimate moment capacity of spiral reinforced concrete columns. The main models explored include AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. The R2 value for Histogram-Based Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Extremely Randomized Trees models demonstrated high accuracy for testing data at 0.95, 0.96, and 0.95, respectively, indicating their robust performance. Furthermore, the Mean Absolute Error of Gradient Boosting and Extremely Randomized Trees on testing data was the lowest at 36.81 and 35.88 respectively, indicating their precision. This comparative analysis presents a benchmark for understanding the strengths and limitations of each method. These machine learning models have shown the potential to significantly outperform empirical formulations currently used in practice, offering a pathway to more reliable predictions of the ultimate moment capacity of spiral RC columns.

Highlights

  • This research applies various machine learning models to estimate the ultimate moment capacity of spirally reinforced concrete columns.
  • Through comparison and benchmarking against both experimental and conventional model results, the study validates the high reliability of machine learning predictions for spiral RC columns' moment capacity.
  • The developed soft-computing models are found to significantly outperform the empirical formulations introduced by the codes of practice.
  • This work underscores the potential of machine learning in improving accuracy and reliability in structural engineering predictions, contributing to safer and more efficient structural designs.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]     Tanaka H. Effect of lateral confining reinforcement on the ductile behaviour of reinforced concrete columns. 1990.
[2]     Coffman HL, Marsh ML, Brown CB. Seismic Durability of Retrofitted Reinforced‐Concrete Columns. J Struct Eng 1993;119:1643–61. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1643).
[3]     Desayi P, Sundara Raja Iyengar KT, Sanjeeva Reddy T. Equation for stress-strain curve of concrete confined in circular steel spiral. Matériaux Constr 1978;11:339–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473875.
[4]     Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R. Observed Stress‐Strain Behavior of Confined Concrete. J Struct Eng 1988;114:1827–49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1827).
[5]     Li B, Park R, Tanaka H. Stress-Strain Behaviour of High Strength Concrete Confined by Ultra High and Normal Strength Transverse Reinforcements. Aci Struct J 2001;98:395–406.
[6]     Zhou J-K, Lin W-K, Guo S-X, Zeng J-J, Bai Y-L. Behavior of FRP-confined FRP spiral reinforced concrete square columns (FCFRCs) under axial compression. J Build Eng 2022;45:103452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103452.
[7]     Ahmadi M, Naderpour H, Kheyroddin A. ANN Model for Predicting the Compressive Strength of Circular Steel-Confined Concrete. Int J Civ Eng 2017;15:213–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0096-0.
[8]     Chang W, Zheng W. Estimation of compressive strength of stirrup‐confined circular columns using artificial neural networks. Struct Concr 2019;20:1328–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800259.
[9]     Koçer M, Öztürk M, Hakan Arslan M. Determination of moment, shear and ductility capacities of spiral columns using an artificial neural network. J Build Eng 2019;26:100878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100878.
[10]   Naderpour H, Parsa P, Mirrashid M. Innovative Approach for Moment Capacity Estimation of Spirally Reinforced Concrete Columns Using Swarm Intelligence–Based Algorithms and Neural Network. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 2021;26. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000612.
[11]   Naderpour H, Mirrashid M, Parsa P. Failure mode prediction of reinforced concrete columns using machine learning methods. Eng Struct 2021;248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113263.
[12]   Renaud O, Victoria-Feser M-P. A robust coefficient of determination for regression. J Stat Plan Inference 2010;140:1852–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2010.01.008.
[13]   Ramanauskas R, Kaklauskas G, Sokolov A. Estimating the primary crack spacing of reinforced concrete structures: Predictions by neural network versus the innovative strain compliance approach. Mech Adv Mater Struct 2020;29:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2020.1751352.
[14]   Noori F, Varaee H. Nonlinear Seismic Response Approximation of Steel Moment Frames Using Artificial Neural Networks. Jordan J Civ Eng 2022;16:108–38.
[15]   Shishegaran A, Karami B, Danalou E, Varaee H, Rabczuk T. Computational predictions for predicting the performance of steel 1 panel shear wall under explosive loads. Eng Comput 2021;ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-09-2020-0492.
[16]   Shishegaran A, Varaee H, Rabczuk T, Shishegaran G. High correlated variables creator machine: Prediction of the compressive strength of concrete. Comput Struct 2021;247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106479.
[17]   Zhang G, Safaeian N, Rashnoozadeh H, S. Band S, Mosavi A. Reliability assessment of compressive and splitting tensile strength prediction of roller compacted concrete pavement: introducing MARS-GOA-MCS. Int J Pavement Eng 2021:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2021.1990920.
[18]   Ashrafian A, Safaeian Hamzehkolaei N, Dwijendra NKA, Yazdani M. An Evolutionary Neuro-Fuzzy-Based Approach to Estimate the Compressive Strength of Eco-Friendly Concrete Containing Recycled Construction Wastes. Buildings 2022;12:1280. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081280.
[19]   Safaeian Hamzehkolaei N, Alizamir M. Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Seismic Retrofit Cost Estimation Using Structural Parameters. J Soft Comput Civ Eng 2021;5:32–57. https://doi.org/10.22115/scce.2021.284630.1312.
[20]   Varaee H, Safaeian Hamzehkolaei N, Safari M. A Hybrid Generalized Reduced Gradient-Based Particle Swarm Optimizer for Constrained Engineering Optimization Problems. J Soft Comput Civ Eng 2021;5:86–119. https://doi.org/10.22115/scce.2021.282360.1304.
[21]   Karimi Pour A, Shirkhani A, Safaeian N, Zhuge Y, Farsangi E. Performance evaluation of composite concrete-filled steel tube columns by steel fibers and different cross-section shapes: Experimental and numerical investigations. J Constr Steel Res 2023;200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107656.