[1] Rezaie M. Evaluation of Safety Status to Shahriar Educational Environment by the Checklist System for Safety Reports. 6th Int. Reliab. Saf. Eng. Conf., Shiraz, Iran: Shiraz University; 2021.
[2] Kayumova LR, Zakirova VG. Educational Environment Risks: Problems of Identification and Classification. Int J Environ Sci Educ 2016;11:1013–9.
[3] Baeva IA, Laktionova EB. Expert assessment of the educational environment for comfort and safety. Psychol Sci Educ 2013.
[4] Hartmann T. Engineering Informatics to Support Civil Systems Engineering Practice BT - Advanced Computing Strategies for Engineering. In: Smith IFC, Domer B, editors., Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018, p. 262–75.
[5] Charles S. Columbia Disaster Underscores the Risky Nature of Risk Analysis. Science (80- ) 2003;299:1001–2. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.299.5609.1001.
[6] Ma H, Chu X, Wang W, Liu X, Xue D. A directed failure causality network (DFCN) based method for function components risk prioritization under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Adv Eng Informatics 2019;41:100920. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100920.
[7] Islam MS, Nepal MP, Skitmore M, Attarzadeh M. Current research trends and application areas of fuzzy and hybrid methods to the risk assessment of construction projects. Adv Eng Informatics 2017;33:112–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.06.001.
[8] Tizani W, Mawdesley MJ. Advances and challenges in computing in civil and building engineering. Adv Eng Informatics 2011;25:569–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2011.08.006.
[9] Mela K, Tiainen T, Heinisuo M. Comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods for building design. Adv Eng Informatics 2012;26:716–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.03.001.
[10] Zhang L, Wang T, Li H, Huang B, Zhou X. Agent evaluation based on multi-source heterogeneous information table using TOPSIS. Adv Eng Informatics 2019;42:100971. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100971.
[11] Jing L, Jiang S, Li J, Peng X, Ma J. A cooperative game theory based user-centered medical device design decision approach under uncertainty. Adv Eng Informatics 2021;47:101204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101204.
[12] Ping Y-J, Liu R, Lin W, Liu H-C. A new integrated approach for engineering characteristic prioritization in quality function deployment. Adv Eng Informatics 2020;45:101099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101099.
[13] Dong Y, Tan R, Zhang P, Peng Q, Shao P. Product redesign using functional backtrack with digital twin. Adv Eng Informatics 2021;49:101361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101361.
[14] Mayer MJ, Furlong MJ. How Safe Are Our Schools? Educ Res 2010;39:16–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357617.
[15] Morrison GM, Furlong MJ, Morrison RL. School Violence to School Safety: Reframing the Issue for School Psychologists. School Psych Rev 1994;23:236–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1994.12085709.
[16] Cornell DG. Threat assessment as a school violence prevention strategy. Criminol Public Policy 2020;19:235–52.
[17] Cohen J. School safety and violence: Research and clinical understandings, trends, and improvement strategies. Int J Appl Psychoanal Stud 2021;18:252–63.
[18] Arroyo Resino D, Sandoval-Hernandez A, Eryilmaz N. Characteristics of the schools resilient to violence. A study based on data from ICCS 2016 in Chile, Mexico and Colombia. Int J Educ Res 2021;109:101839. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101839.
[19] Glew GM, Fan M-Y, Katon W, Rivara FP. Bullying and School Safety. J Pediatr 2008;152:123-128.e1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.05.045.
[20] Astor RA, Guerra N, van Acker R. How can we improve school safety research? Educ Res 2010;39:69–78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357619.
[21] Bao Q, Ruan D, Shen Y, Hermans E, Janssens D. Improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS for road safety performance evaluation. Knowledge-Based Syst 2012;32:84–90.
[22] Kikinezhdi OM, Zhyrska HY, Chip RS, Vasylkevych YZ, Hovorun T V. Psychology of the Gender-Equitable Environment: Research of Problems. J Intellect Disabil Treat 2020;8:538–47.
[23] Rezaee M, Shamskia N. A Novel Design Model for Sustainable Development and Safety Management in the School Incident Command System (Case Study: Shahriar Schools). J Emerg Manag 2021;10:101–12.
[24] Rezaie, M and Rajabalinejad M. Safety culture for schools; a comparative study. first Natl. Conf. Earthq. Risk Manag. with Vulnerability Approach Vital Struct. Arter., Tehran, Iran: Tehran University; 2017.
[25] Fang S, Zhou P, Dinçer H, Yüksel S. Assessment of safety management system on energy investment risk using house of quality based on hybrid stochastic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making approach. Saf Sci 2021;141:105333.
[26] Khan MW, Ali Y, De Felice F, Petrillo A. Occupational health and safety in construction industry in Pakistan using modified-SIRA method. Saf Sci 2019;118:109–18.
[27] Rezaie M. Designing an effective safety management system for schools (Descriptive analysis on the case study: schools’ Shahriar). Qom: Farzanegan-e-Danesh; 2018.
[28] Ghasemi A, Nadiri M. Performance assessment of Iranian petrochemical companies using sustainable excellence model. Saf Sci 2016;87:280–91.
[29] La Fata CM, Giallanza A, Micale R, La Scalia G. Ranking of occupational health and safety risks by a multi-criteria perspective: inclusion of human factors and application of VIKOR. Saf Sci 2021;138:105234.
[30] Figueroa EAP, Malisan P, Grimaz S. Implementation of seismic assessment of schools in El Salvador. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2020;45:101449. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJDRR.2019.101449.
[31] Grimaz S, Malisan P, TORRES PORRAS JJ. VISUS Methodology: A Quick Assessment for Defining Safety Upgrading Strategies of School Facilities. PLANET@RISK 2015;3:126–36.
[32] Mubita K. Understanding School Safety and Security: Conceptualization and Definitions. J Lexicogr Terminol (Online ISSN 2664-0899 Print ISSN 2517-9306) 2021;5:76–86.
[33] Akyildiz H, Mentes A. An integrated risk assessment based on uncertainty analysis for cargo vessel safety. Saf Sci 2017;92:34–43.
[34] Irwin, V., Wang, K., Cui, J., Zhang, J., & Thompson A. Report on Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2020. 2021.
[35] Rezaie, M and Rajabalinejad M. Risk management of schools: Identification, assessment and control the hazardous risks (Case study: School of Abu-Ali-Sina). 1st Int. Conf. Exhib. Iran. Sch. Iran Program. Provis. Sch. Space, Equipment, Technol., Yazd-World Heritage City, Iran: Yazd University; 2019.
[36] Rezaie M, Rajabalinejad M. Introduce digital safety system model of construction management for high importance buildings: A case study on tehran municipality region one’s burgomasters. Int J Adv Sci Technol 2019;28:125–42.
[37] Wright P, Fields B, Harrison M. Deriving human-error tolerance requirements from tasks. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Requir. Eng., IEEE; 1994, p. 135–42.
[38] Reason J. Human error: models and management. Bmj 2000;320:768–70.
[39] Rezaie, M Shamskia N. Response to safety culture challenge in civil engineering projects in order to prevented the hazardous circumstances future with used to Matrix decision model: (Case study: Shahriar firefighting & safety services organization). 6th Natl. Conf. Appl. Res. Civ. Eng. Archit. Urban Manag., Tehran, Iran: K. n. Toosi University of Technology; 2019.
[40] Shabakhty N, Enferadi MH, Ghasemi MR, Varaee H. Application of Shape Memory Alloy Tuned Mass Damper in Vibration Control of Jacket type Offshore Structures. Iran J Mar Sci Technol 2020;7:64–75.
[41] Barkhordari MA, Foroughi M, Aqaee SM, Varaee H. Introducing a method to enhance a poor rigid connection. Civil-Comp Proc 2010;93. https://doi.org/10.4203/ccp.93.119.
[42] Varaee H, Ajdar S. A Comprehensive study for Lifeline network interaction under seismic conditions (Text in Persian). Conf. 3rd Int. Conf. Seism. Retrofit. Tabriz-Iran, 2010.
[43] Varaee H, Shishegaran A, Ghasemi MR. The life-cycle cost analysis based on probabilistic optimization using a novel algorithm. J Build Eng 2021;43:103032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103032.
[44] Lemly AD. Aquatic selenium pollution is a global environmental safety issue. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2004;59:44–56.
[45] Agathokleous E. Environmental hormesis, a fundamental non-monotonic biological phenomenon with implications in ecotoxicology and environmental safety. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2018;148:1042–53.
[46] Chen F, Wang J, Deng Y. Road safety risk evaluation by means of improved entropy TOPSIS–RSR. Saf Sci 2015;79:39–54.
[47] Vidal R, Sánchez-Pantoja N. Method based on life cycle assessment and TOPSIS to integrate environmental award criteria into green public procurement. Sustain Cities Soc 2019;44:465–74.
[48] Roy B. Paradigms and Challenges BT - Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrogott M, editors., New York, NY: Springer New York; 2005, p. 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5_1.
[49] Tian G, Zhang H, Feng Y, Wang D, Peng Y. Green decoration materials selection under interior environment characteristics : A grey-correlation based hybrid MCDM method. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018;81:682–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.050.
[50] Zhang X, Zhang Q, Sun T, Zou Y, Chen H. Evaluation of urban public transport priority performance based on the improved TOPSIS method: A case study of Wuhan. Sustain Cities Soc 2018;43:357–65.
[51] Yazdi M. Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach. Saf Sci 2018;110:438–48.
[52] Doumpos, M., & Grigoroudis E. Multicriteria decision aid and artificial intelligence: links, theory and applications. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.