Escort Patterns in Dual-Worker Households with Students

Document Type : Regular Article


1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States

2 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran


Individuals have been regarded as independent decision makers in majority of transportation analysis. However, agents’ behaviors are usually affected by the interactions among the members in a group; and therefore, individual decision-making paradigms may result in unrealistic outcomes and erroneous interpretations of the results. In light of this, the present study develops discrete choice models in individual and group levels and compares their prediction power in predicting the choice of escort pattern in dual-worker households with at least one under-18-year-old student. The main purpose is to reveal the efficiency of each approach in analyzing parent-child joint activities and highlight the effect of model misspecification in predicting group decisions using a quantifiable measure. The results reveal that more than 25 percent of correct predictions in school trips will be missed when the conventional individual decision-making procedure, rather than a group decision-making paradigm, is adopted. Also, 20 percent of the observed reduction in the explanatory power of the model was associated with trips from school. The findings of this study underscore the significance of implementing group decision-making paradigms when the context requires.


Google Scholar | Scopus PlumX Metrics


Main Subjects

[1]     Badoe D. Modelling Work-Trip Mode Choice Decisions in Two-Worker Households. Transp Plan Technol 2002;25:49–73. doi:10.1080/03081060290032051.
[2]     Clifton KJ. Independent Mobility Among Teenagers: Exploration of Travel to After-School Activities. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2003;1854:74–80. doi:10.3141/1854-08.
[3]     Timmermans H, Borgers A, van Dijk J, Oppewal H. Residential Choice Behaviour of Dual Earner Households: A Decompositional Joint Choice Model. Environ Plan A Econ Sp 1992;24:517–33. doi:10.1068/a240517.
[4]     Borgers A, Timmermans H. Transport facilities and residential choice behavior: A model of multi-person choice processes. Pap Reg Sci 1993;72:45–61. doi:10.1007/BF01538349.
[5]     Gliebe JP, Koppelman FS. A model of joint activity participation between household members. Transportation (Amst) 2002;29:49–72.
[6]     Gliebe JP, Koppelman FS. Modeling household activity–travel interactions as parallel constrained choices. Transportation (Amst) 2005;32:449–71. doi:10.1007/s11116-005-5328-0.
[7]     Kostyniuk LP, Kitamura R. An empirical investigation of household time space paths. Recent Adv Travel Demand Anal 1983:266–89.
[8]     Bhat CR. A model of post home-arrival activity participation behavior. Transp Res Part B Methodol 1998;32:387–400. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00006-X.
[9]     Jones PM, Dix MC, Clarke MI, Heggie IG. Understanding Travel Behaviour (No. Monograph) 1983.
[10]    Niemeier D, Morita J. Duration of trip-making activities by men and women. Transportation (Amst) 1996;23. doi:10.1007/BF00223061.
[11]    Srinivasan KK, Athuru SR. Analysis of within-household effects and between-household differences in maintenance activity allocation. Transportation (Amst) 2005;32:495–521. doi:10.1007/s11116-005-5355-x.
[12]    Bhat CR, Pendyala RM. Modeling intra-household interactions and group decision-making. Transportation (Amst) 2005;32:443.
[13]    Timmermans HJP, Zhang J. Modeling household activity travel behavior: Examples of state of the art modeling approaches and research agenda. Transp Res Part B Methodol 2009;43:187–90. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.004.
[14]    Deka D. An explanation of the relationship between adults’ work trip mode and children’s school trip mode through the Heckman approach. J Transp Geogr 2013;31:54–63. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.05.005.
[15]    Yarlagadda AK, Srinivasan S. Modeling children’s school travel mode and parental escort decisions. Transportation (Amst) 2008;35:201–18. doi:10.1007/s11116-007-9144-6.
[16]    Weiss A, Habib KN. A generalized parallel constrained choice model for intra-household escort decision of high school students. Transp Res Part B Methodol 2018;114:26–38. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2018.05.008.
[17]    Irfan M, Khurshid AN, Khurshid MB, Ali Y, Khattak A. Policy Implications of Work-Trip Mode Choice Using Econometric Modeling. J Transp Eng Part A Syst 2018;144:04018035. doi:10.1061/JTEPBS.0000158.
[18]    McQuaid RW. A model of the travel to work limits of parents. Res Transp Econ 2009;25:19–28. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2009.08.001.
[19]    Vovsha P, Petersen E. Escorting Children to School. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2005;1921:131–40. doi:10.1177/0361198105192100115.
[20]    Schwanen T. Gender Differences in Chauffeuring Children among Dual-Earner Families. Prof Geogr 2007;59:447–62. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00634.x.
[21]    McDonald NC, Aalborg AE. Why Parents Drive Children to School: Implications for Safe Routes to School Programs. J Am Plan Assoc 2009;75:331–42. doi:10.1080/01944360902988794.
[22]    Yoon SY, Doudnikoff M, Goulias KG. Spatial Analysis of Propensity to Escort Children to School in Southern California. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2011;2230:132–42. doi:10.3141/2230-15.
[23]    He SY. Will you escort your child to school? The effect of spatial and temporal constraints of parental employment. Appl Geogr 2013;42:116–23. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.003.
[24]    Gupta S, Vovsha PS, Livshits V, Maneva P, Jeon K. Incorporation of Escorting Children to School in Modeling Individual Daily Activity Patterns of Household Members. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2014;2429:20–9. doi:10.3141/2429-03.
[25]    LIU G. A behavioral model of work-trip mode choice in Shanghai. China Econ Rev 2007;18:456–76. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2006.09.001.
[26]    Nurul Habib KM, Day N, Miller EJ. An investigation of commuting trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto Area: Application of a joint discrete-continuous model. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 2009;43:639–53. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2009.05.001.
[27]    Belz NP, Lee BHY. Composition of Vehicle Occupancy for Journey-to-Work Trips. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2012;2322:1–9. doi:10.3141/2322-01.
[28]    Nurul Habib KM. Modeling commuting mode choice jointly with work start time and work duration. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 2012;46:33–47. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.012.
[29]    Panter J, Desousa C, Ogilvie D. Incorporating walking or cycling into car journeys to and from work: The role of individual, workplace and environmental characteristics. Prev Med (Baltim) 2013;56:211–7. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.014.
[30]    Almasri E, Alraee S. Factors Affecting Mode Choice of Work Trips in Developing Cities—Gaza as a Case Study. J Transp Technol 2013;03:247–59. doi:10.4236/jtts.2013.34026.
[31]    Tushara T, Rajalakshmi P, Bino IK. Mode choice modelling for work trips in Calicut City. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng ISSN 2013:2278–3075.
[32]    van der Waerden P, Lem A, Schaefer W. Investigation of Factors that Stimulate Car Drivers to Change from Car to Carpooling in City Center Oriented Work Trips. Transp Res Procedia 2015;10:335–44. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.083.
[33]    McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior 1973.
[34]    McFadden D. Modelling the choice of residential location 1978.
[35]    Strathman JG, Dueker KJ. Understanding trip chaining. Spec Reports Trip Veh Attrib 1990.
[36]    Mauch M, Taylor BD. Gender, Race, and Travel Behavior: Analysis of Household-Serving Travel and Commuting in San Francisco Bay Area. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1997;1607:147–53. doi:10.3141/1607-20.